A letter I wrote in response to a column written in the Sunday Times. It irked me, to say the least!
I have been a long time follower and fan of South African cricket. I have for just as long been an, unapologetic supporter of the supposedly arrogant captain of the protea’s team. When Mickey Arthur joined the fray as coach of the team, I thought it was a breath of fresh air and I looked forward to seeing South African cricket reaching new heights. All things equal, these lofty new heights were reached. An unprecedented test series win in Australia as well as a series win in the limited overs form of the game, then the test series victory in England. Feats not to be sneezed at. Not unless you’re a politician in this country trying to take the gloss off some really quite brilliant results.
I was incensed to read Faizel Dawjee’s article in the paper last week. In essence blaming the lack of transformation on the senior national team coach. What a turn off it is to read such articles. I am in full agreement that not nearly enough is being done to change the game in this country. I also cannot nor will I dispute that this game (much like wealth) in this country remains in the hands of a few. However, it is not nor should it be the job of the senior national coach to ensure that development is taking place in the sport. Surely, he has more technical issues which require his time? The administrators-whose job we’re led to believe is to administrate-should ensure that there are appropriate structures in this country to ensure long term development and transformation in the sport of cricket.
Dawjee makes a number of sweeping statements to justify his political point of view. Being one of the “self-styled” cricketing experts he spoke of I’ll offer some of my expert opinions on issues he has raised. Justin Ontong was and is a fine cricketer. He was I think an unfair tool in a political farce. I don’t think he was ready to be playing at international level at the time and it is possible that the brouhaha raised in that whole saga has put paid to his international career. Ashwell Prince was injured in the first test and replaced by JP Duminy. Duminy impressed in the subsequent test and went about cementing his place at no5 in the batting order, Dawjee will recall that upon return Neil Mackenzie was left out of the side following some out of sorts’ performances and replaced by Ashwell Prince who then excelled in the role of opening the batting. Clearly unsuited? Maybe. Making lemonade when life gives you lemon? Definitely! Dropping the world’s best wicketkeeper would be a blunder of epic proportion. The likes of which can only be seen in movies. Why does Dawjee’s expertise take precedence over ours? I notice he doesn’t talk of Boeta Dippenaar’s eternal battle to be a fully fledged Protea. Nor does he touch on Johan Louw’s dalliance with the team, nor Justin Kemp, nor Claude Henderson who performed admirably for a number of seasons without a selector even batting an eyelid. My point is there are a number of players who are good enough-in our expert opinions- to make the national team but the coach shouldn’t be forced to pick the players we want. He should pick the players he wants! The players he feels will take South Africa to the number one ranking in world cricket. Oh and by the way did Lonwabo Tsotsobe play his first match for the Proteas in Mickey Arthur’s team?
The age group coaches and scouts should not rest until they’ve unearthed most of the prodigious talent we have in this country. There should be a solid grounding and platform for the less advantaged to have a chance to thrill us. That really should be what we’re discussing. Not the senior national teams’ inability to pick from a pool of 5 or 6 players.
In terms of good governance I’m not sure that the President of CSA should be involved in on-field activities. If we argue, however, that he should; then we should see him from day to day in his shorts or tracksuit going to net practices. We should see him helping with player’s deficiencies, getting to know and understand the team dynamic. Until the President of CSA is doing those things perhaps he shouldn’t be getting involved in on field issues.
The danger with politics and politicians is the more they meddle, the more they ruin.